November 30, 2005
Members present: Members
Don Anderson Kathy Bahr
Mary Jo Carnot Robert
Margaret Crouse Lois Veath
Review of revised Web site
half of left-hand column less vital
Why not list under units?
Student outcomes – academic advising, career and placement services,
There are more programs than what is under extended campus
Individual administrator is responsible for assessment benefit of
Physical facilities change to “Support Function”
3rd under person PR or in co-curricular
Personnel – names, photos, title
on photos of each faculty, department head, or none at all
are we assessing?
sure the answer is on the site
that aren’t assessed lead to questioning why not
Should placement be under Arts and Sciences? or under each department
that has general studies?
Problem with the current layout:
Arts and Sciences
General Education and Honors program
and Professional Studies
programs there needs to be a contact person
History is not lost, but the deans and heads don’t have them
How much history is needed?
find as much as possible, but not spend too much time on it – the new
developing plan should be the main focus
Each program matrix is on the Web site
will deans meet with department head to sort out?
Roweton will present to executive staff this week
Anything in the area not mentioned or incorrect, let Don Anderson,
meeting January 25, 2006
draft needs to be worked on
– instruction has caused some of the change
communications – how are student reports shared?
Answer: They’re not
For next meeting
up into groups and review separate components
of effective student assessment
of assessment event